Systems and Methods for Sensing and Tracking Radiation Blocking Objects on a Surface

ABSTRACT

Several system for tracking one or more radiation blocking objects on a surface are disclosed. At least three radiation sensors are provided adjacent the surface and a plurality of radiation sources as provided adjacent the surface. Radiation from at least some of the radiation sources can reach each of the radiation sensors. One or more radiation blocking objects on the surface attenuate radiation from one or more radiation sources from reaching each of the sensors. One or more polygons is calculated based on the attenuated radiation sources and the positions of the sensors. The position of the one or more radiation blocking objects is estimated and may be tracked based on the polygons.

This application is a continuation of patent application No. PCT/CA2011/000985 which was filed on Sep. 2, 2011 and is a non-provisional application of provisional application No. 61,379,585, which was filed on Sep. 2, 2010, and all of which are incorporated herein by reference.

FIELD

The described embodiments relate to systems, methods and sensors for sensing and tracking the position of one or more radiation blocking objects on a surface.

BACKGROUND

A variety of computer input and other devices require tracking of one or more objects such as fingers, styluses, pens or other objects as they positioned on or moved across a surface. For example, computer monitors and other display screens may be fitted with a touchscreen that allows a user to provide inputs to a computer using a finger or a stylus, as they are moved across the display surface of the screen. Similarly, a whiteboard may be fitted with a pen positioning sensing system that tracks the position of one or more pens as they are moved across the writing surface of the whiteboard.

Existing systems suffer from a variety of deficiencies, including excessive complexity and cost, high computational overhead that affects both their accuracy and response time, and other deficiencies.

SUMMARY

The present invention provides various systems for detecting the presence and position of one or more radiation blocking objects as the radiation blocking objects are positioned on or moved across a surface. The surface may be any type of surface such as the display surface of computer monitor or other display device, a writing surface such as a whiteboard, bulletin board, sheet of paper or wall or another surface such as a part of a toy or game.

Various embodiments according to a first aspect of the invention include a frame or housing with a plurality of radiation sources and radiation sensors mounted on it. The frame will typically, but not necessarily, be mounted to or be combined with a housing, frame or support of an underlying system such as a whiteboard, a display monitor, a bulletin board, a game, toy or other device. In some embodiments, the frame or housing may be combined with a display monitor to form a touchscreen. A controller activates some or all of the radiation sources sequentially. The radiation sources may be activated in a sweep fashion from one side of the frame to the other, or they may be activated in a different order. While each radiation source is activated, the radiation incident on some or all of the radiation sensors is measured.

A radiation blocking object present within the frame will typically block or attenuate one or more of the paths between some of the radiation sources and some of the radiation sensors. By successively measuring the attenuation of radiation from such blocking, the position of the radiation blocking object is estimated.

In embodiments according to another aspect of the invention, one or more diffusers are used to diffuse radiation emitted by the radiation sources. The diffusers may allow the position of a radiation blocking object to be estimated more accurately, particularly when the radiation blocking object blocks two or more of the paths between the radiation sources and a radiation sensor.

In some embodiments, radiation emitted by the radiation sources is modulated at a modulation frequency or with a modulation pattern. The sensors are sensitive to the modulation frequency or pattern and ignore radiation that is not modulated according the frequency or pattern, reducing the effect of ambient and other spurious radiation in estimating the position of a radiation blocking object.

In one aspect, a system for sensing the position of one or more radiation blocking objects on a surface is provided. The surface is mounted to or within a frame, and in some embodiments, the surface and frame are generally rectangular. Radiation sources are provided on the frame and emit radiation across the surface. Radiation sensors are provided at two or more positions on the frame. Each sensor is positioned such that radiation from a plurality of the radiation sources may be incident on each the sensor. Each sensor provides a radiation intensity level corresponding to the intensity of radiation incident on it to a controller. The controller is coupled to the radiation sources and sequentially activates the radiation sources. As each radiation source is activated, radiation from the radiation source may be incident on some or all of the radiation sensors. The controller samples the radiation intensity level from the radiation sensors. When a radiation blocking object is present on the surface, the radiation blocking object will typically block or attenuate radiation from one or more of the radiation sources. The controller identifies radiation sources for which the radiation intensity signal is attenuated compared to a baseline or threshold intensity level.

The controller estimates the position of the radiation blocking object based on the position of the attenuated radiation sources (i.e. radiation sources for which the radiation intensity level is attenuated due to the presence of a radiation blocking object) as measured from each radiation sensor. The controller first estimates an angular direction of the radiation blocking object relative to at least two of the radiation sensors. The angular directions are combined to estimate the position of the radiation blocking object on the surface relative to a reference position.

In some embodiments, the controller combines the radiation intensity levels samples from a radiation source into a radiation intensity signal and identifies ranges of attenuated radiation sources. A center radiation source within the range is identified, and the angular position of the radiation blocking object relative to at least one of the radiation sensors is estimated based on the center radiation source in each radiation intensity signal.

In other embodiments, the relative attenuation of radiation intensity signals may be combined to estimate the position of the radiation blocking object. For example, if a range of radiation intensity levels corresponding to a range of radiation sources are attenuated by a radiation blocking object, a weighted average based on the relative attenuations and positions of each radiation source is used to refine the estimated angular position of the radiation blocking object relative to each radiation sensor. The refined estimate angular positions are combined to provide an estimated position of the radiation blocking object relative to the reference position.

In some embodiments, multiple radiation blocking objects on the surface may be sensed. The controller analyzes radiation intensity signals from each of the radiation sensors to identify attenuated radiation intensity levels corresponding to the presence of one or more radiation blocking objects. The maximum number of radiation blocking objects identified in any one radiation intensity signal is assumed to be the minimum number of radiation blocking objects present on the surface. The controller estimates an angular direction for each radiation blocking object apparently visible from each radiation sensor, relative to the sensors. The angular positions are combined to estimate the position of each radiation blocking object. The prior positions of radiation blocking objects, when such prior positions are known, may be used to select likely current positions of radiation blocking objects when the angular directions can lead to different estimates. For example, in some embodiments, two angular directions are identified relative to each of two radiation sensors. The angular directions can be represented as lines originating from each of the sensors. The lines intersect at four points, which may be considered in pairs to be potential positions of two radiation blocking objects. Previously known positions for one or both radiation blocking objects are used by calculating the shortest movement required from the previous positions of the radiation blocking objects to the potential current positions based on the intersections. The radiation blocking objects are deemed to be located at the potential position that requires the shortest movement. In other embodiments, other criteria may be used to resolve between different potential positions. For example, the trajectory of a radiation blocking object over a preceding time period, a distance or number of iterations of a sensing process may be used to estimate the current position of a radiation blocking object.

In some embodiments, angular positions of one or more radiation blocking objects relative to three or more radiation sensors are determined and the angular positions are combined to estimate the positions of the radiation blocking objects.

These and other aspects of the invention are described below in a description of the some example embodiments of the invention.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

Various embodiments of the invention will now be described with reference to the drawings, in which:

FIG. 1 illustrates a first system according to the present invention;

FIGS. 2 a and 2 b illustrate radiation intensity signals according to the system of FIG. 1; and

FIG. 3 illustrates a radiation intensity signal according to another embodiment;

FIG. 4 illustrates a radiation intensity signal according to yet another embodiment;

FIGS. 5 a and 5 b illustrate another embodiment;

FIG. 6 illustrates another embodiment;

FIG. 7 illustrates yet a further embodiment;

FIG. 8 illustrates a method of identifying or estimating the positions of radiation blocking objects on a surface using the system of FIG. 7.

FIGS. 9 a and 9 b illustrate radiation intensity signals corresponding to one of the radiation blocking objects of FIG. 7;

FIGS. 10 a and 10 b illustrate radiation intensity signals corresponding to both of the radiation blocking objects of FIG. 7;

FIG. 11 illustrates the system of FIG. 7 with the radiation blocking objects in a different position;

FIGS. 12 a and 12 b illustrate radiation intensity signals corresponding to FIG. 11;

FIG. 13 illustrates the system of FIG. 7 with the radiation blocking objects in a different position;

FIGS. 14 a and 14 b illustrate radiation intensity signals corresponding to FIG. 13;

FIGS. 15 a-15 f illustrate another embodiment;

FIGS. 16 a-16 c and 17 a-17 c illustrates radiation intensity signals in the embodiment of FIGS. 15 a and 15 b;

FIG. 18 illustrates a method of operating the embodiment of FIGS. 15 a and 15 b;

FIG. 19 illustrates the embodiment of FIGS. 15 a and 15 b in a different configuration;

FIGS. 20 a-20 c illustrate radiation intensity signals corresponding to FIG. 19; and

FIG. 21 illustrates another embodiment.

The drawings are illustrative only and are not drawn to scale. Various elements of some embodiments may not be shown for clarity. Similar and corresponding elements of the various embodiments are identified by similar reference numerals.

DESCRIPTION OF EXEMPLARY EMBODIMENTS

Exemplary embodiments described herein provide details relating to systems and methods for determining the position of one or more radiation blocking objects in relation to various radiation sources and radiation sensors. In some embodiment, the radiation sources and sensors may be mounted in a frame. In some embodiments, the systems may include or be used with various underlying devices such as whiteboards, display monitors and other devices. In some embodiments, the systems may include or be used with an underlying surface such as a whiteboard, a wall, the surface of a display screen or any other generally planar surface. The radiation sources may emit radiation in the visible light spectrum or in other spectrums, such as the ultraviolet or infrared spectrums. The embodiments described herein are exemplary only and other implementations and configurations are also possible.

Reference is first made to FIG. 1, which illustrates a system 100 for sensing or estimating the position of a radiation blocking object 124. System 100 includes a pair of radiation sensors 102 a, 102 b, a controller 104 and a plurality of radiation sources 106 mounted on a frame or housing 108. Frame 108 has a top side 110, bottom side 112, left side 114 and a right side 116. In this embodiment, radiation sources 106 are mounted on the left, bottom and right sides of frame 108. Radiation sensor 102 a is mounted at the top left corner of the frame 108 and radiation sensor 102 b is mounted at the top right corner of the frame 108.

Frame 108 surrounds a surface 128. In various embodiments, the surface 128 may be the surface of a display screen, a writing surface or another surface. In this embodiment, frame 108 provides a bezel at the edges of the surface 128. Radiation sources 106 and radiation sensors 102 are mounted within the bezel. In some embodiments, the frame may only partially surround or enclose the surface, for example, the frame may not enclose the top edge of the surface if no radiation sensors or sources are mounted adjacent the top edge. In other embodiments, the frame may support but not enclose the surface. For example, the frame may provide a support for the surface, radiation sensors and radiation sources, but may not have a bezel or other element that surrounds the surface. In other embodiments, the frame may itself provide some or all of the surface. For example, the frame may have solid surface between its edges and radiation blocking objects may be positioned on the solid surface when system 100 is in use. Typically, as in these examples, the surface will be mounted to the frame.

The top left corner of frame 108 is cut away in FIG. 1 to reveal radiation sensor 102 a and several radiation sources 106. The bottom right corner of frame 108 is also cut away to reveal some of the radiation sources 106. Each radiation source 106, in this embodiment, is a LED that emits radiation in the infra-red spectrum. In other embodiments, the radiation sources may be various types of sources that emit radiation in other spectrums, including the visible light spectrum and the UV spectrum. Radiation sources 106 are mounted on frame 108 such that radiation from the radiation sources reaches one or both of the radiation sensors 102. In this embodiment, radiation sources are equally spaced along the left, bottom and right sides of frame 108. In this embodiment, frame 108 is rectangular with square corners. The sides of frame 108 are parallel to the axes of an x-y plane. In some embodiments, the radiation sources may not be equally spaced. In some embodiments, the frame may have a non-rectangular shape.

Controller 104 includes a processor 120, which may any type of device or component capable of operating system 100, including a hardware component, a software component or a component including both hardware and software or firmware or both. For example, processor 120 may be a microprocessor, microcontroller, gate array or any type of data processing or computing device. The processor can be programmed or configured to operate system 100 and its components and to communicate with external devices. Controller 104 may also includes a memory 121, which may be accessed by processor 120. Processor 120 controls the operation of controller 104 and system 100. Instructions may be recorded in the memory 121, and may be loaded into the processor to configure the processor to perform control, data processing, data transformation and communication operations for controlling the operation of the controller 104 and the system 100 as described below. Controller 104 is coupled to each radiation source 106. Only some of these connections are illustrated in FIG. 1. Controller 104 is capable of activating each radiation source 106 independently so that when one radiation source is activated or on (i.e. emitting radiation) the remaining radiation sources are not activated or off (i.e. not emitting radiation).

In this embodiment, each radiation sensor 102 is a PIN photodiode that is capable of sensing radiation emitted by the radiation sources 106 on the two opposing sides of frame 108. Radiation sensor 102 a senses radiation emitted by the radiation sources 106 on the bottom and right sides of frame 108. Radiation sensor 102 b senses radiation emitted by the radiation sources 106 on the bottom and left sides of frame 108. Each radiation sensor 102 is coupled to controller 104 and provides a radiation intensity level to the controller corresponding to the intensity of radiation falling on the radiation sensor 102 at any particular time. The radiation intensity level has a relatively high value when the corresponding radiation sensor 102 is receiving radiation from a radiation source 106 and a relatively low value when the corresponding radiation sensor 102 is not receiving radiation from a radiation source 106. A series of radiation intensity levels corresponding to the radiation sources 106 may be combined into a radiation intensity signal that can be used to estimate the position of the radiation blocking object 124. This is explained below.

In other embodiments each radiation sensor may be any device that is responsive to the radiation emitted by the radiation sources and capable of providing a radiation intensity level corresponding to radiation incident on the sensor. For example, a light sensitive element such as a photosensor, photodiode, photocell, a solar cell or a photovoltaic cell may be used to provide radiation intensity levels. The radiation sensor may provide the output radiation intensity level in any format compatible with the controller 104, including a digital or analog format.

Controller 104 is programmed with the dimensions of frame 108, the position of each radiation source 106 and the positions of each radiation sensor 102. In this example, controller 104 is programmed with the following information:

-   -   Sensors 102 a and 102 b are separated by a distance d. Radiation         sensor 102 a is at the (0,0) position on the x-y plane and         radiation sensor 102 b is at the (d,0) position on the x-plane.     -   For each radiation source on the bottom or right side of the         frame 108, the angle between the left side of the frame (or a         line parallel to the left side of the frame, depending on the         position of the radiation sensor 102 a) and the path between         radiation sensor 102 a and the radiation source, or a value         corresponding to the angle.     -   For each radiation source on the left or bottom side of the         frame 108, the angle between the right side of the frame (or a         line parallel to the right side of the frame, depending on the         position of the radiation sensor 102 b) and the path between         radiation sensor 102 b and the radiation source, or a value         corresponding to the angle.

Under the control of controller 104, system 100 is operable to estimate the physical position P_(124a)(x_(124a), y_(124a)) of radiation blocking object 124. In FIG. 1, radiation blocking object 124 is illustrated as a stylus. The tip of the stylus is in contact with the surface 128, at point P₁₂₄, which corresponds to the physical position P_(124a) discussed here and the pixel position P_(124d) discussed below.

In operation, controller 104 sequentially activates the radiation sources 106. While a radiation source 106 is activated, controller 104 samples the output from one or both of the radiation sensors 102 to obtain a radiation intensity level corresponding to the intensity of radiation incident on each radiation sensor 102. Typically, the path between the radiation source and each radiation sensor will be blocked, partially blocked (ie. partially attenuated) or clear. In some embodiments, while a radiation source 106 is activated, the controller may only check the radiation intensity level for a radiation sensor 102 if there is a direct path between the radiation source 106 and the radiation sensor 102. For example, there is a direct path between radiation sensor 102 a and the radiation sources 106 on the bottom side 112 and the right side 116 of frame 108. Similarly, there is a direct path between radiation sources 106 on the left side 114 and the bottom side 112 of the frame 108 and radiation source 102 b. In other embodiments, the controller 104 may check the radiation intensity level at a radiation sensor 102 even when the activated radiation source 106 does not have a direct path to the radiation sensor.

Instructions for performing this process are recorded in memory 121. Processor 120 accesses the instructions in memory 121 an executes the instructions to perform the process described above and those described below. Processor 120 may also record data in memory 121 during the performance of this process.

In other embodiments, the specific placement of the radiation sources and radiation sensors and the shape of the frame (which need not be rectangular and may have another shape) will effect which radiation sources have a direct path to which radiation sensors.

Returning to the present embodiment, when radiation source 106 a is activated, controller 104 need not sample radiation sensor 102 a to obtain a radiation intensity level because there is no direct path between radiation source 106 a and radiation sensor 102 a that is not obstructed by other radiation sources 106. Controller 104 does sample the radiation intensity level provided by radiation sensor 102 b, which will have a relatively high value indicating that the path between radiation source 106 a and radiation sensor 102 b is clear, or not blocked.

When radiation source 106 c is activated, controller 104 samples both radiation sensors 102 a and 102 b. The radiation intensity level from radiation sensor 102 a is relatively high, indicating that the path between radiation source 106 c and radiation sensor 102 a is clear. The radiation intensity level from radiation sensor 102 b is relatively low, indicating that the path between radiation source 106 c and radiation sensor 102 b is blocked, in this example, by radiation blocking object 124.

When radiation source 106 e is activated, the radiation intensity levels from radiation sensors 102 a and 102 b respectively indicate that the paths between radiation source 106 e and radiation sensors 102 a and 102 b are clear.

When radiation source 106 f is activated, controller 104 samples the radiation intensity level from radiation source 102 a which indicates that the path between radiation source 106 f and radiation sensor 102 a is blocked by radiation blocking object 124. Controller 104 samples the radiation intensity level from radiation sensor 102 b, which indicates that the path between radiation source 106 f and radiation sensor 102 a is clear.

As controller 104 sequentially activates the radiation sources and samples the radiation intensity levels corresponding to each radiation source 106, controller 104 records the outcomes as follows:

Path to Radiation Path to Radiation Radiation source Sensor 102a Sensor 102b . . . — . . . 106a — Clear . . . . . . . . . 106c Clear Blocked . . . . . . . . . 106e Clear Clear . . . . . . . . . 106f Blocked — . . . . . . —

Reference is made to FIGS. 2 a and 2 b. FIG. 2 a illustrates a radiation intensity signal 122 a corresponding to the radiation intensity levels obtained by controller 104 from radiation sensor 102 a. FIG. 2 b illustrates a radiation intensity signal 122 b corresponding to the radiation intensity levels obtained by controller 104 from radiation sensor 102 b. Each radiation intensity signal comprises the output of radiation sensor 102 b as the radiation sources, including radiations sources 106 a, 106 b, 106 c and 106 d are sequentially activated and then deactivated. While any one radiation source is on, the remaining radiation sources are off.

Using the radiation intensity signals 122 a and 122 b, controller 104 can estimate the physical position of radiation blocking object 124. Controller 104 assumes that the radiation block object 124 is located in the blocked path for each radiation sensor. In this example, the position P_(124a)(x_(124a), y_(124a)) for the radiation blocking object 124 can be estimated:

$\begin{matrix} {x_{124\; a} = \frac{{d \cdot \tan}\; \theta_{f}}{{\tan \; \theta_{f}} + {\tan \; \phi_{c}}}} & (1) \\ {y_{124\; a} = {{x_{124\; a} \cdot \tan}\; \theta_{f}}} & (2) \end{matrix}$

In the embodiment of FIG. 1, the resolution with which the position of radiation blocking object 124 can be estimated depends on a number of factors, including the spacing between the radiation sources 106. By placing the radiation sources close to one another, a greater resolution may be achieved.

In equations (1) and (2) above, the tan of angles θ_(f) and φ_(c) are used to calculate the position of point P₁₂₄. In system 100, the tan of the angles θ between the left side 114 and the path to the radiation sources 106 visible to radiation detector 102 a, and the tan of the angles φ between the right side 116 and path to the radiation sources 106 visible to radiation sensor 102 b are recorded in a data storage location accessible to the controller 104. This allows equations (1) and (2) to be calculated without requiring the tan of each angle θ_(f) and φ_(c) to be calculated, thereby allowing the position of P₁₂₄ to be calculated more rapidly. In other embodiments, the angles themselves may be recorded or another value corresponding to the angles may be recorded. In some embodiments multiple values corresponding to the angular relationship between each of the radiation sources, the radiation sensors and reference lines (such as lines parallel to the right and left edges of the frame) may be recorded.

System 100 may be operated in different manners, depending on the programming of controller 104.

In another embodiment, system 100 may be operated to refine the estimated positions P_(124a) of a radiation blocking object on the surface 128. Reference is made to FIGS. 1 and 3. Depending on the distance between the radiation sources, the dimensions of the radiation blocking object and the distance between the radiation blocking object and a radiation sensor, the path between several radiation sources and the radiation sensor may be blocked by the radiation blocking object. For example, if radiation sources 106 b, 106 c and 106 d are sufficiently close together, then radiation blocking object 124 may at least partially block the path between two or all three of the radiation sources and radiation sensor 102 b, thereby attenuating the radiation intensity level for all three radiation sources, particularly if the radiation blocking object is close to radiation sensor 102 b. In some embodiments, controller 104 determines the center radiation source in a range of radiation sources whose path to a particular radiation sensor is blocked. Optionally, the controller 104 may treat a radiation source as blocked only if its radiation intensity level is below some threshold level, providing a mechanism for including or excluding slightly attenuated radiation sources at the edges of a range of attenuated radiation sources. In this example, the center radiation source would be radiation source 106 c. The controller then estimates the position of the radiation blocking object based on the angle θ or φ between the center radiation source and the relevant side of the frame 108 (in this case, angle φ, relative to the right side 116). In other embodiments, the controller may use the middle angle θ or φ (depending on the relevant radiation sensor) among the range of angles for the radiation sources that are blocked. If a different value corresponding to each angle relating the radiation sources to the radiation sensors is recorded in the controller 104, such as the tan of each angle, then the recorded value may be used after determining the center radiation source or angle.

The estimated position P_(124a)(x_(124a), y_(124a)) is a physical position, measured in the same units as dimension d that separates radiation sensors 102 a and 102 b.

Controller 104 is coupled to an interface 148, which in this embodiment is a universal serial bus port.

In other embodiments, the interface may be any type of communication interface. For example, interface 148 may be an analog interface or a digital data interface such as a serial data port or a parallel data port. In embodiments where the interface is an analog interface, the controller may provide analog signals (such as a current signal or a voltage signal) corresponding to the value of x_(124a) and y_(124a). In an embodiment where the interface is a digital interface, the controller may be configured to convert the physical positions x_(124a) and y_(124a) into corresponding digital positions x_(124d) and y_(124d) relative to the sensors 102 a and 102 b. The controller may be configured to provide the digital positions x_(124d) and y_(124d) at the interface.

In the present embodiment, the surface 128 is the surface of a LCD display screen. The LCD display screen has a resolution of X horizontal pixels by Y vertical pixels. For example, in some embodiments, the screen may have a resolution of 1280×1024 pixels or 1920×1080 pixels. In other embodiments a display screen may have any other standard or non-standard pixel resolution. Controller 104 converts the physical position a corresponding pixel position P_(124d)(x_(124d), y_(124d)). Controller 104 may be configured to do so using a variety of techniques, including the use of lookup tables that provide the horizontal and vertical pixel positions corresponding the horizontal and vertical physical positions, using a formula to convert between the physical and pixel positions or using any other method. Controller 104 provides the digital position P_(124d) at the interface 148.

Reference is made to FIGS. 1 and 4. In another embodiment, the controller 104 is configured or programmed differently to estimate the position P_(124a) of the radiation blocking object 124 in a different manner. In this embodiment, the intensity signals 122 are used to more precisely estimate the angular position of the radiation blocking object 124 relative to each radiation sensor 102 and a side of the frame 108.

FIG. 4 illustrates a portion of a radiation intensity signal 122 b when controller 104 is configured according to this embodiment. In this embodiment, the controller 104 establishes a baseline intensity level for each radiation source in combination with each radiation sensor. For each radiation source, controller 104 samples the radiation intensity level from radiation sensor 102 b while the radiation source is on, and in the absence of a radiation blocking object to generate a baseline intensity level 126. The baseline intensity levels for radiation source 106 a and 106 b-106 d are shown.

In this embodiment, during startup of system, the baseline intensity level is initially determined for each radiation source, with respect to each radiation sensor from which the radiation source is visible (i.e. if there is a direct path between the radiation source and the radiation sensor). An initial set of samples of the intensity signal are discarded while the system is starting up. For a selected time period following this initial start-up period, the radiation intensity level is sampled while the radiation source is on. The radiation intensity level is recorded and an average intensity level is determined for the radiation source at each radiation sensor. For example, if each radiation source is activated 50 times per second, the baseline intensity level may be calculated using the first 25 samples for each radiation source, at each radiation sensor, representing half of a second. In other embodiments, the baseline intensity level may be calculated over more or fewer samples, or for a longer period or shorter period. The baseline intensity level for each radiation sensor inherently takes into account ambient and other conditions affecting the amount of radiation that reaches the radiation sensor when a particular radiation source is switched on. Such other conditions include the amount of radiation emitted by each radiation source, the physical distance between the radiation source and the radiation sensor and may also include the manner in which system 100 is used.

The baseline intensity level calculated for each radiation source 106, with respect to each radiation sensor 102, may be updated over time. For example, a moving average of some of the radiation intensity readings over a recent time period may be calculated to refine the baseline level as ambient and other conditions change. Some radiation intensity readings may not be used to calculate the updated baseline intensity level. For example, every tenth or twentieth radiation intensity reading may be used to calculate the moving average for each baseline intensity level. This reduces the amount of data that must be stored to calculate a baseline intensity level corresponding to a longer time period and also reduces the computation time required in the controller to address this task. Typically, the baseline intensity level will be calculated for a recent period from a part of a second to a few seconds or tens of seconds. When the path between a radiation source 106 and a radiation sensor 102 is blocked the radiation intensity level for that source at that sensor will be significantly reduced, although ambient radiation and some radiation may still reach the radiation sensor around the radiation blocking object. The controller may exclude radiation intensity levels below a certain threshold compared to the current baseline intensity level when refining the baseline intensity as is further described below. Various other methods for calculating a baseline intensity level for each radiation source at each radiation sensor may also be used. In some embodiments, one baseline intensity level may be calculated for a group or all of the radiation sensors. In other embodiments a pre-determined intensity level may be used as the baseline intensity level for some or all of the radiation sources.

In this embodiment, each time a radiation source 106 is activated, the radiation intensity level from each radiation sensor 102 from which the radiation source is visible is sampled and compared to the existing baseline intensity level for that radiation source at that radiation sensor. If the current intensity level is more than some threshold below the baseline intensity level, the percentage difference from the baseline level is calculated. For example, the threshold may be 90% of the baseline intensity level. If the current intensity level is greater than 90% of the baseline level, the current intensity level may be used to further refine the baseline level, or it may be discarded. If it is less than 90% of the baseline level, the processor assumes that the path between the radiation source 106 and the radiation sensor 102 is at least partially blocked. In other embodiments, other threshold levels may be used.

The controller successively activates the radiation sources in a cyclic process. After each cycle of switching on the radiation sources 106 and measuring the radiation intensity level from each radiation sensor for the radiation sources, the controller estimates the position of the radiation blocking object.

FIG. 4 illustrates the attenuation of several radiation sources 106 relative to their respective baseline levels 126. The current intensity level for radiation source 106 a, as measured at radiation sensor 102 is greater than 90% of the baseline intensity level 126 a, so it is ignored for the purpose of estimating the position of the radiation blocking object 124, although the current intensity level may be used to refine the baseline level for radiation source 106 a as measured at radiation sensor 102 b. Similarly, the current intensity level for radiation source 106 b is greater than 90% of baseline intensity level 126 b, so it is ignored for the purpose of estimating the position of the radiation blocking element, but may be used to refine the baseline level, which would then be slightly higher.

The current intensity levels for radiation sources a106 c and 160 d are below 90% of their respective baseline intensity levels 126 c and 126 d. The current intensity level for radiation source 106 c is at 53% of baseline intensity level 126 c. The current intensity level for radiation source 106 d is at 31% of the baseline intensity level 126 d. Controller 104 normalizes these deviations to a total of 100%: the relative attenuation of radiation from radiation source 106 c represents 63% of the total attenuation (31%/84%=63%); and the relative attenuation of radiation from radiation source 106 d represents 37% of the total attenuation.

The angle φ between the right side 116 and a line 132 between radiation source 102 b and radiation blocking object 124 is then estimated as follows. The angle φ_(c) for radiation source 106 c is 44°. The angle φ_(d) (not shown) corresponding to radiation source 106 d is 42°. In this embodiment, rather than recording the angles themselves, the tan of each angle is recorded. The tan of the angle φ₁₂₄ between the left side of the frame 108 and the path between radiation sensor 102 b and radiation blocking object 124 can then be estimated as follows:

$\begin{matrix} {{{Tan}\left( \phi_{124} \right)} = {{0.63 \cdot {\tan \left( {44{^\circ}} \right)}} + {0.37 \cdot {\tan \left( {42{^\circ}} \right)}}}} \\ {= {0.9415.}} \end{matrix}$

Angle φ₁₂₄ is 43.27°

In an embodiment in which the angles themselves are recorded, angle φ₁₂₄ may be estimated as follows:

$\begin{matrix} {\phi_{124} = {{{0.63 \cdot 44}{^\circ}} + {{0.37 \cdot 42}{^\circ}}}} \\ {= {43.26{{^\circ}.}}} \end{matrix}$

The estimates of angle φ₁₂₄ differ due to the non-linearity between an angle and its tangent.

An angle θ₁₂₄ is calculated for the angle between left side 114 and the line between radiation sensor 102 a and the radiation blocking object 124. The two calculated angles φ₁₂₄ and θ₁₂₄ are used to estimate the position (x_(b), y_(b)) of the radiation blocking object 124.

In this manner, controller 104 may use the attenuation of two or more radiation sources as measured at one of the radiation sensors to estimate the angular position of radiation blocking object relative to the left or right side of the frame 108 and one of the radiation sensors 102 by normalizing the relative attenuations of the different radiation sources and then calculating a weighted average of the angle of those sources from the relevant side of the frame and the radiation sensor.

This embodiment may allow the position of the radiation blocking object 124 to be estimated more accurately than the first embodiment by allowing angles θ and φ to be estimated between the specific angles at which the radiation sources 106 are positioned.

In some embodiments, it may be desirable to create a baseline range of intensity for each radiation source to account for ambient radiation. For example, in some embodiments, ambient radiation may be sensed by a radiation sensor, with the result that the radiation intensity level provided by a radiation sensor may measure both radiation from a radiation source and from ambient radiation. Controller 104 may be configured to determine the radiation intensity level at each radiation sensor 102 while all of the radiation sources 106 are switched off, thereby establishing an ambient radiation level for each radiation sensor 102. Each ambient radiation level may be an average of a group of samples, it may be a moving average of recently obtained samples or may be calculated in another manner. In some cases, the amount of ambient radiation incident on a radiation sensor may vary over time. It may be desirable to periodically sample ambient radiation at each radiation sensor to update the ambient radiation level. In some embodiments, it may be desirable to obtain an ambient radiation level for each radiation sensor with all of the radiation sources off immediately before (or after) obtaining a radiation intensity level with a radiation source turned on.

The ambient radiation level may be used to scale or otherwise adjust the radiation intensity level to remove or reduce the effect of ambient radiation on the estimated positions of a radiation blocking object. For example, the ambient radiation level (or an amount based on the ambient radiation level) may be subtracted from both the baseline intensity level 126 and the measured radiation intensity level for each radiation source before analyzing a radiation intensity signal and estimating the position of radiation blocking object.

System 100 may be used in various configurations to identify the position of various types of radiation blocking objects 124. For example, system 100 may be used with a whiteboard or other display surface. Frame 108 may be attached to the edge or frame of the whiteboard, or may also be the frame of the whiteboard. The radiation blocking object 124 may be a pen used to write on the whiteboard and as the pen is moved about the surface of the whiteboard, its position is estimated by controller 104. Controller 104 may be coupled to (or may be part of) a whiteboard system for recording estimates of the pen's position. By recording successive estimates of the pen's position, information on the whiteboard may be recreated in an electronic form and may be recorded for subsequent use, and it may be displayed or printed. The whiteboard system may include software to calculate the path of movement of the pen between estimated positions and to smooth the calculated path.

As the pen is used to write on the whiteboard, the ink on the whiteboard may change the amount of ambient light reflected on to a radiation sensor 102 and could also change the amount of radiation propagating from a radiation source 106 to a radiation sensor 102, thereby affecting the level of the radiation intensity measured for some or all of the radiation sources 106. In such embodiments, periodically updating the baseline intensity level for some or all of the radiation sources may improve the accuracy of estimates of the position of a radiation blocking object.

In other embodiments, system 100 may be used with a display monitor or screen to form a touchscreen. Frame 108 may be mounted to the display monitor or may be part of the display monitor's housing. The radiation blocking object 124 in this case may be a finger, and as a person moves their finger onto or off of the display monitor, the presence of the finger is detected and its position on the display screen is estimated by controller 104. Controller 104 may be coupled to (or may be part of) a touch screen system (which would also include the display monitor) and may provide estimates of the finger's position to the touch screen system. As a finger is moved about on the display screen, successive estimates of the finger's position can be recorded in the touch screen system to provide an electronic record of the finger's movement and the estimated positions can be displayed on the display monitor. The touch screen system may include software or other components to calculate the path of movement of the finger between its successive estimated positions and to smooth the calculated path. Such a touch screen system, in combination with system 100, would effectively allow a user to write or draw on the display monitor, or to manipulate objects displayed on the display monitor, using the person's finger.

In a touch screen system, the radiation sources 106 and radiation sensors 102 may be located relatively close to the display screen and the amount of radiation incident on the radiation sensors may vary as the information displayed on the display screen changes. In such embodiments, it may also be beneficial to update the baseline intensity level for some or all of the radiation sources.

Reference is next made to FIGS. 5 a and 5 b. FIG. 5 a illustrates another system 500 for estimating the position of a radiation blocking object 524. FIG. 5 b illustrates the bottom right corner of system 500 in greater detail. System 500 is largely similar to system 100 and corresponding elements are identified with corresponding reference numerals. System 500 includes diffusers 530 mounted adjacent to the radiation sources 506. Diffusers 530 diffuse radiation emitted by the radiation sources, thereby smoothing the amount of radiation apparently emitted along the left, bottom and right sides of the frame 508 by the radiation sources, as viewed from the radiation sensor 502. In this embodiment, the angular position of the radiation blocking object 524 relative to the left and right sides of the frame and the radiation sensors is estimated as described above in relation to system 100. The inventors have found that diffusing the radiation emitted by radiation sources 506 can provide a more accurate estimate of the radiation blocking object's position, particularly when combined with the

Various materials are suitable for use as diffusers 530, including slightly clouded or translucent plastics or other materials that diffuse but do not excessively scatter radiation from the radiation sources such that it cannot accurately be measured by the radiation sensors 102. In some embodiments, optical grade diffusers which diffuse, but do not substantially block the radiation passing through the diffuser, may be used effectively, including diffraction gratings, lenticular diffusers and lenticular diffraction gratings may be used for the diffusers 530. FIG. 5 b illustrates a continuous lenticular diffuser 530 b installed on the bottom side 512 of frame 508 and a continuous lenticular diffuser 530 r installed on the right side 516 of frame 508.

FIG. 6 illustrates a portion of another embodiment 600, corresponding to the portion of system 500 illustrated in FIG. 5 b. In system 600, individual diffusers 630 are installed adjacent each radiation source 506.

In some embodiments of the invention, the controller may vary the intensity of radiation emitted by some or all of the radiation sources. This may be done to vary the measured intensity level for a radiation source at the radiation sensors, to overcome the effect of ambient light, to reduce power consumption by the system, or for other reasons.

In the embodiments described above the frame is rectangular and the radiation sensors are mounted in two corners of the frame. In other embodiments, the frame may have a different shape. For example, the present invention may be used with a bulletin board or other object that has any regular or irregular shape and the frame may be shaped and sized to fit on or over the underlying object. Sensors may be positioned at various places on the frame, including along the sides (which may be straight or curved) of the frame. In each case, the position of each sensor and of the radiation sources visible from the sensor are used geometrically to identify the presence and position of a radiation blocking object.

In some embodiments with rectangular or other frame shapes, additional sensors may be used. For example, additional sensors could be added at the bottom left and right corners of system 100 (FIG. 1) and 500 (FIG. 5 a). In some embodiments, additional radiation sources could be added along the top side 110 of the frame. In some embodiments, additional information about the position of the radiation blocking object 124 or 524 from the additional sensors may be combined to provide a more accurate estimate of the position of the radiation blocking object.

In some embodiments, with rectangular or other frame shapes, sensors may be placed along the sides of the frame. The positioning of radiation sensor and radiation sources may depend on the portion of an underlying system (such as a whiteboard, display monitor or other system) in which a radiation blocking object is to be detected.

In various embodiments, a system according to the present invention may include a bezel (which may be part of the frame) that conceals some or all of the components of the system including the radiation sources, the radiation sensors and diffusers. In some embodiments, the bezel or the frame or both may be painted with radiation absorbing paint or otherwise adapted to reduce the amount of radiation that is reflected toward the radiation sensors from the bezel or the frame or both.

In some embodiments, an optical filter may be placed between some or all of the radiation sensors and some or all of the radiation sources. For example, an optical filter could be installed around the radiation sensors to reduce the amount of ambient and other undesirable radiation that is incident on the radiation sensors.

Reference is next made to FIG. 7, which illustrates a system 700 for simultaneously tracking the position of two or more radiation blocking objects. System 700 is a touchscreen that operates as both an input device and an output device for a connected computer or other external system.

System 700 is similar in construction to systems 100 and 500, and corresponding components are identified by similar reference numerals. System 700 may be used as an electronic whiteboard system or an LCD touch screen.

System 700 includes a pair of radiation sensors 702 a, 702 b, a controller 704, a plurality of radiation sources 706 mounted on a frame 708 and an LCD display screen. Sources 706 are mounted on the left side 714, bottom side 712 and right side 716 of the frame 708. Frame 708 also has a top side 710. Radiation sensor 702 a is mounted at the top left corner of frame 708 and radiation sensor 702 b is mounted at the top right corner of the frame 708. Radiation sensors 702 a and 702 b are separated by a distance d. Controller 704 is coupled to radiation sensors 702 and radiation sources 706. Controller 704 controls the radiation sources and receives radiation intensity levels from the radiation sensors as described above in relation to system 100.

The sides of frame 708 are parallel to the axes of an x-y plane. A pair of radiation blocking objects 724 a and 724 b are positioned such that each of the radiation blocking objects 724 obstructs the straight line path between at least one of the radiation sources 706 and the radiation sensors 702.

The LCD display screen is mounted within frame 708 and has a display surface 728. The line of sight paths along which radiation from the radiation sources 706 to the radiation sensors 702 pass above the display surface, and are generally parallel to the display surface. The LCD display screen has a resolution of X horizontal pixels by Y vertical pixels. For example, in some embodiments the LCD display screen may have a resolution of 1280×1024 pixels or 1920×1080 pixels. Many other pixel resolutions are possible for various display panels. In various embodiments, any type of display panel may be used in place of an LCD panel. Typically, frame 708 will be mounted to the display panel, or will also form part of the housing of the display panel.

System 700 may optionally include diffusers, such as the diffusers 530 and 630 illustrated in FIGS. 5 and 6.

System 700 will typically include several input/output interfaces. In the present embodiment, controller 704 is coupled to a computing device through an interface 748 to transmit the position of radiation blocking objects to the computing device. For example, interface 748 may be a serial interface such as a USB interface or a parallel interface. The LCD display is coupled to the computing device to receive video signals, which are displayed on the display 728, through a video signal interface (not shown).

Reference is next made to FIG. 8, which illustrates a method 800 for identifying or estimating the positions of radiation blocking objects 724 a and 724 b. In this embodiment, method 800 is performed by controller 704. Prior to the start of method 800, no radiation blocking object is positioned on the display surface 728.

Method 800 begins in step 802, in which a first radiation blocking object 724 a is initially positioned on the display surface 728. Instructions for performing method 800 are recorded in memory 721. Controller 720 accesses the stored instructions and executes the instructions to perform the method.

Method 800 will be explained by way of example. For the purposes of the example, the first radiation blocking object is initially placed on the display surface in the position shown in FIG. 7. In this step, radiation blocking object 724 b is not placed on the display surface 728.

Reference is made to FIGS. 9 a and 9 b, which illustrate radiation intensity signals 722 a and 722 b after radiation blocking object 724 a has been placed on the display surface 728.

Radiation intensity signal 722 a illustrates that radiation intensity levels from radiation sources 706 i-706 k are attenuated at radiation sensor 702 a. Radiation intensity signal 722 b illustrates that radiation intensity levels from radiation source 706 a-406 c are attenuated at radiation sensor 702 b.

Controller 704 uses radiation intensity signal 722 a and 722 b as described above in relation to system 100 to estimate the physical position P_(724a)(x_(aa), y_(aa)) of radiation blocking object 724 a. Position P_(724a)(x_(aa), y_(aa)) is a physical (or analog) position calculated relative to positions of the sensors 702 and based on angles (θ_(a), φ_(a)).

Controller 704 maintains a touch table, in which the last known position of each radiation blocked object that has been detected on the surface 728 is recorded. Typically, the touch table may be a set of variables or part of a database that is stored in memory 721. In the present embodiment, the touch table includes two slots, A and B, for recording the last known positions of up to two radiation blocking objects. In other embodiments, the touch table may include more than two slots, or may include a variable number of slots.

Controller 704 records the physical position P_(724a) of the first radiation blocking object 724 a in slot A in the touch table:

Slot X Position Y Position A x_(aa) y_(aa) B — —

Physical position P_(724a)(x_(aa), y_(aa)) corresponds to a pixel (or digital) position P_(724d)(X_(ad), y_(ad)) on the LCD display 728. Controller 704 converts the physical position P_(724a) to the corresponding pixel position P_(724d), and provides the pixel position P_(724d) at interface 748.

Method 800 then proceeds to step 804. In step 804, Controller 704 operates radiation sources 706 and sensors 702 to sequentially obtain radiation intensity levels associated with radiation sources 706 from each radiation sensor 702. The radiation intensity levels from each radiation sensor are combined into a radiation intensity signal 722. Controller 704 analyzes each radiation intensity signal 722 to determine the number of radiation blocking objects that are represented in each of the radiation intensity signals.

In this embodiment, up to two radiation blocking objects may be placed on surface 728.

Reference is made to FIGS. 10 a and 10 b, which illustrate example radiation intensity signals 722 a and 722 b when two radiation blocking objects 724 a and 724 b are placed on surface 728. Each of the radiation intensity signals 722 a and 722 b has two distinct ranges of radiation intensity levels that are attenuated at each of the radiation sensors 702. (A radiation source for which the radiation intensity level is attenuated may be referred to as an attenuated radiation source.) Each range of attenuated radiation intensity levels corresponds to a separate radiation blocking object 724. The ranges of attenuated radiation intensity levels are separated by at least one radiation source that is not attenuated. For example, and referring also to FIG. 7, in radiation intensity signal 722 a, radiation intensity levels for radiation sources 706 i-706 k and 706 p-706 r are attenuated at radiation sensor 702 a. The attenuation of radiation sources 706 i-706 k corresponds to radiation blocking object 724 a. The attenuation of radiation sources 706 p-706 r corresponds to radiation blocking object 724 b. Controller 704 is configured to identify the two distinct ranges of attenuated radiation sources by identifying at least one radiation source between the ranges that is not attenuated. In some situations, a range of attenuated radiation sources may consist of a single attenuated radiation source.

Reference is made to FIGS. 11, 12 a and 12 b, which illustrate another condition in which two radiation blocks have been placed on surface 728. In FIG. 11, radiation blocking objects 724 a and 724 b are positioned such that angles θ_(a) and θ_(b) are separated by a relatively small angle.

FIG. 12 a is a radiation intensity signal 722 a which illustrates that the radiation blocking objects 724 a and 724 b have an overlapping effect on the attenuation of radiation intensity levels from one or more radiation sources. Radiation blocking object 724 a appears to attenuate radiation from radiation sources 706 i-706 l. Radiation blocking object 724 b appears to attenuate radiation from radiation sources 706 l-706 o. Controller 704 is configured to distinguish the two ranges of attenuated radiation signals by identifying two distinct minima in the radiation intensity signal, separated by at least one radiation intensity value that is higher than either of the minima. For example, in FIG. 12 a, radiation intensity levels for radiation sources 706 j and 706 n are local minima. These local minima are separated by several radiation intensity levels that are higher than either minima. In various embodiments, the controller 704 may be configured to identify two distinct ranges in various ways. In some cases, a range of attenuation radiation intensity levels may have only a single attenuated radiation source. For example, in some embodiments, the controller 104 may be configured to identify at least one radiation intensity level between local minima radiation intensity levels that exceed the minima by some predetermined about or ratio. In some embodiments, the controller may be configured to require at least two (or a high number) of radiation intensity values between local minima.

FIG. 12 b illustrates a radiation intensity signal 722 b corresponding to the positions of radiation blocking object 724 a and 724 b in FIG. 11. Radiation intensity signal 722 b includes two distinct regions of the attenuated radiation intensity levels at radiation sources 706 a-706 c and 706 g to 706 i. The two ranges are separated by one or more radiation intensity levels that are not attenuated. Controller 704 is configured to distinguish the two ranges of attenuated radiation intensity levels as described above in relation to FIGS. 10 a and 10 b.

Controller 704 is thus configured to identify to ranges of attenuated radiation sources in each of the radiation intensity signals illustrated in FIGS. 10 a, 10 b, 12 a and 12 b.

Reference is next made to FIGS. 13, 14 a and 14 b, which illustrate another condition in which two radiation blocking objects 724 a and 724 b have been placed on the surface 728.

In FIG. 13, the two radiation blocking objects 724 a and 724 b are generally collinear with radiation sensor 702 a. Radiation emitted by radiation source 706 j, which is also generally collinear with the radiation blocking objects, is at least partially blocked by radiation blocking object 724 b from reaching radiation sensor 702 a. Radiation blocking object 724 a may block additional radiation from radiation source 706 j from reaching radiation sensor 702 a, but radiation blocking object 724 a is at least partially in the shadow of radiation blocking object 724 b.

FIG. 14 a illustrates a radiation intensity signal 722 a corresponding to the positions of the radiation blocking object 724 a and 724 b in FIG. 13. The radiation intensity levels for radiation sources 706 i-706 k are attenuated by radiation blocking objects 724 a and 724 b. Radiation intensity signal 722 a is similar to a radiation intensity signal resulting from a single radiation blocking object on the surface 728. Controller 704 analyzes radiation intensity signal 722 a and is able to identify only one apparent radiation blocking object.

FIG. 14 b illustrates a radiation intensity signal 722 b corresponding to the positions of radiation blocking object 724 a and 724 b in FIG. 13. Radiation intensity signal 722 b includes two distinct regions of the attenuated radiation intensity levels at radiation sources 706 a-706 c and 706 d to 706 f. The two ranges are separated by one or more radiation intensity levels that are not attenuated. Controller 704 is configured to distinguish the two ranges of attenuated radiation intensity levels as described above.

Controller 704 thus determines whether each of radiation intensity signals 722 a and 722 b obtained in this step 804 appears to contain zero, one or two ranges of attenuated radiation sources.

Method 800 continues from step 804 depending on the number of radiation blocking objects identified in the radiation intensity signals as follows:

-   -   if each of the radiation intensity signals 722 contains one         range of attenuated radiation sources (as illustrated in FIGS. 9         a and 9 b), then method 800 proceeds to step 806;     -   if both of the radiation intensity signals 722 contains two         ranges of attenuated radiation sources (as illustrated in FIGS.         10 a and 10 b and in FIGS. 12 a and 12 b), then method 800         proceeds to step 808;     -   if either one of the radiation intensity signals 722 contains         two ranges of attenuated radiation sources and the other         radiation intensity signal contains one range of attenuated         radiation sources (as illustrated in FIGS. 14 a and 14 b), then         method 800 proceeds to step 810; and     -   if both of the radiation intensity signals 722 contains zero         ranges of attenuated radiation sources, method 800 proceeds to         step 820; and     -   otherwise, method 800 returns to step 804;

In step 806, controller 704 determines the position of a radiation blocking object 724 on the display surface 728. Controller 704 calculates an angle θ and an angle φ corresponding to the weighted average attenuation in the respective ranges of attenuated intensity levels in each of the radiation intensity signals 722 a and 722 b. A radiation blocking object 724 is deemed to be located at the intersection point of a pair of lines 746 and 732 corresponding to the angles θ and φ and the positions of the radiation sensors 702 a and 702 b, as described above.

If only one position corresponding to one radiation blocking object is recorded in the touch table, the intersection point is deemed to be the new physical position of the radiation blocking object. The new position is recorded in the touch table in place of the previously recorded position. The controller converts the physical position of the radiation blocking object into a corresponding pixel position, which is then provided at the interface 748.

If two positions corresponding to two radiation blocking objects are recorded in the touch table, the controller determines which of the previously recorded positions is closest to the intersection point. The intersection point is deemed to be the new position of the radiation blocking object corresponding to the closest previously recorded position, which is replaced in the touch table with the position of the intersection point. The controller converts the physical position of the radiation blocking object into a corresponding pixel position, which is then provided at the interface 748.

The further previously recorded position is deleted from the touch table.

Method 800 then returns to step 804.

Reference is additionally made to FIGS. 7, 10 a and 10 b.

In step 808, controller 704 determines various points at which the radiation blocking objects 724 may be positioned based on the two ranges of attenuated radiation sources identified in each of the radiation intensity signals 722 a and 722 b in step 804.

For example, In radiation intensity signal 722 a, radiation sources 706 i-406 k and 706 p-406 r are attenuated at radiation sensor 702 a. The two ranges of attenuated radiation sources are separated by at least one radiation source that is not attenuated.

Controller 704 analyzes each group of attenuated sensors independently and calculates an angle θa based on a weighted averaging of the attenuation of sources 706 i-706 k, as described in relation to angle θ₁₂₄ above. Angle θ_(a) defines a line 746 a that extends through the position of radiation sensor 702 a.

Controller 704 also calculates an angle θ_(b) based on the attenuation of sources 706 p-706 r. Angle θ_(p) defines a line 746 b that extends through the position of sensor 702 a.

In radiation intensity signal 722 b, radiation sources 706 a-706 c and 706 g-706 i are attenuated at radiation sensor 702 b. Controller 704 calculates an angle φ_(a) based on the attenuation of sources 706 a-706 c and an angle φ_(b) based on the attenuation of source 706 g-706 i. Angle φ_(a) defines a line 732 a that passes through the position of sensor 702 b. Angle φ_(b) defines a line 732 b that passes through the position of sensor 702 b.

Line 746 a intersects with lines 732 a and 732 b at points 734 and 736. Line 746 b intersects with line 732 a and 732 b and points 738 and 740. The four intersection points are shown in the following table:

Line 732a Line 732b Line 746a 734 736 Line 746b 738 740 The four points 734-740 may be considered in two pairs. The radiation blocking objects 724 a and 724 b may be either at points 734 and 740 or at points 736 and 738.

Method 800 then proceeds to decision step 812.

In step 810, controller 704 identifies various points at which the radiation blocking objects 724 a and 724 b may be positioned based on the two ranges of attenuated radiation sources in one of the radiation intensity signals 722 and the single range of attenuated radiation sources in the other radiation intensity signal.

Reference is additionally to made to FIGS. 13, 14 a and 14 b.

For the radiation intensity signal 722 having two attenuated ranges of radiation sources, each range is analyzed separately to determine two angles θa and θb or φa and φb, as described in relation to step 808. For example, radiation intensity signal 722 b in FIG. 14 b has two distinct ranges of attenuated radiation sources and the two angles φa and φb illustrated in FIG. 13 are calculated as described above. Two corresponding lines extending from the corresponding radiation sensor 702 are also calculated. In this example, lines 732 a and 732 b are calculated.

For the radiation intensity signal having only one range of attenuated radiation sources 706, only one corresponding angle θ or φ can be calculated. In this example, radiation intensity signal 722 a (FIG. 14 a) has only one range of attenuated radiation sources 706 i-706 k. A corresponding angle θa and line 746 a are calculated.

Angle θa is duplicated as angle θb, and line 746 a is duplicated as line 746 b.

Controller 704 then calculates points 734-740 based on the intersections of lines 746 a and 746 b with lines 732 a and 732 b, as described in step 808.

Method 800 then proceeds to step 812.

In step 812, controller 704 determines the number of position recorded in the touch table. If only one position is recorded in the touch table, then method 800 proceeds to step 812. If two positions are recorded in the touch table, then method 800 proceeds to step 814.

Step 814 is performed if the position of one radiation blocking is recorded in the touch table, and one additional radiation blocking object is newly identified, based on at least one of the radiation intensity signals 722 a or 722 b or both having two ranges of attenuated radiation sources.

Controller 704 determines which points 734 and 740 or 736 and 738 correspond to the two radiation blocking objects 724 a and 724 b.

Controller 704 determines which point 734-440 is closest to the position recorded in the touch table. In this example, the physical position P1 a of radiation blocking object 724 a was recorded in slot A of the touch table in step 806. The closest point (among points 734-740) to the previously known position P1 a is deemed to be the current position P1 a of the first radiation blocking object 724 a. Position P1 a will correspond to one point in one of the pairs of points (734 and 740 or 736 and 738). The other point in the same pair is deemed to be the position P2 a (x_(ba), y_(ba)) of the second radiation blocking object 724 b. For example, in the example illustrated in FIG. 7, the last known position P1 a for radiation blocking object 724 a is closest to position 734. Radiation blocking object 724 a is deemed to be positioned at point 734, and the position P2 a of the second radiation blocking object 724 b is deemed to be point 740.

Controller 704 updates the touch table with the position P1 a of the first radiation blocking object 724 a in slot A of the touch table and records the position P2 a of the second radiation blocking object 724 b in slot B of the touch table:

Slot X Position Y Position A x_(aa) y_(aa) B x_(ba) y_(ba)

Controller 704 converts the physical positions P1 a and P1 a of the radiation blocking objects 724 a and 724 b into corresponding pixel positions P1 d and P2 d and provides them at interface 748 to a coupled computing device.

Method 800 then returns to step 804.

In step 816, the positions of the first and second radiation blocking object 724 are tracked as they are moved on the display surface 728.

Method 800 reaches step 816 when the touch table has previously been updated with the positions of two radiation blocking object 724 (in either step 814 or 816). The positions of the two radiation blocking objects is updated in the touch table and their respective positions are reported at interface 748.

Controller 704 analyzes each possible combination of movements from the last recorded positions P1 a and P2 a in the touch table. In this embodiment, the four possible combinations are as follows:

-   -   Combination 1: Radiation blocking object 724 a moved to position         734; and Radiation blocking object 724 b moved to position 740.     -   Combination 2: Radiation blocking object 724 a moved to position         740; and Radiation blocking object 724 b moved to position 734.     -   Combination 3: Radiation blocking object 724 a moved to position         736; and Radiation blocking object 724 b moved to position 738.     -   Combination 4: Radiation blocking object 724 a moved to position         738; and Radiation blocking object 724 b moved to position 736.         For each combination, controller 704 is configured to calculate         the total distance that the two radiation blocking objects 724         would move. For example, for combination 3, the first radiation         blocking object 724 a would move from position P1 a to position         736 and the second radiation blocking object 724 b would move         from position P2 a to position 738. The distance that each         radiation blocking object may be calculated using standard         geometric techniques.

For each combination, the distances that each radiation blocking object would move are summed together. In this example, each combination results in the following total distances:

-   -   Combination 1: 0.2 mm     -   Combination 2: 82.4 mm     -   Combination 3: 46.5 mm     -   Combination 4: 85.3 mm

Controller 704 is configured to deem the radiation blocking objects to have moved in accordance with the combination that requires the shortest total movement of the two radiation blocking objects. In the present example, this is combination 1. Radiation blocking object 724 a is deemed to have moved to point 734. Radiation blocking object 724 b is deemed to have moved to point 740. Controller 704 updates the touch table with the new position of each radiation blocking object. Controller 704 converts the new physical positions P1 a and P2 a of the radiation blocking objects 724 a and 724 b into corresponding pixel positions P1 d and P2 d and provides them at interface 748 to a coupled computing device.

Method 800 then returns to Step 804.

Method 800 reaches step 820 if both radiation blocking objects have been removed from the display surface 728. The controller deletes all recorded positions in the touch table and may optionally provide an indication at interface 748 that no radiation blocking objects have been detected on the display surface 728.

Using method 800, controller 704 provides successive positions of one or two radiation blocking objects as they are positioned on the display surface 728 and moved about the display surface 728. The method terminates when no radiation blocking object is identified on the display surface.

In system 700 and method 800, the positions of radiation blocking objects are recorded in the touch table as physical positions and the distances between various points are calculated in physical dimensions. In other embodiments, the positions may be recorded and distances may be calculated in pixel dimensions.

Reference is next made to FIGS. 15 a and 15 b, which illustrate another system 1500 for simultaneously tracking the position of multiple radiation blocking objects. System 1500 is similar in construction to systems 100, 500 and 700 and corresponding components are identified by similar reference numerals. As with the systems described above, system 1500 may be used as an electronic whiteboard system or a touchscreen system.

System 1500 includes three radiation sensors 1502 a, 1502 b and 1502 c, a controller 1504, a plurality of radiation sources 1506 mounted on a frame 1508 and an LCD display screen. Sources 1506 are mounted on the left side 1514, bottom side 1512 and right side 1516 of the frame 1508. Frame 1508 also has a top side 1510. Radiation sensor 1502 a is mounted at the top left corner of frame 1508. Radiation sensor 1502 b is mounted at the top right corner of the frame 1508. Radiation sensor 1502 c is mounted between radiation sensors 1502 a and 1502 b on the top side 1520 of the frame. Radiation sensors 1502 a and 1502 b are separated by a distance d₁. Radiation sensors 1502 a and 1502 c are separated by a distance d₂. Controller 1504 is coupled to radiation sensors 1502 and radiation sources 1506. Controller 1504 controls the radiation sources and receives radiation intensity levels from the radiation sensors as described above in relation to system 100.

The sides of frame 1508 are parallel to the axes of an x-y plane. In FIG. 15 a, a radiation blocking object 1524 a is positioned such that the radiation blocking object 1524 obstructs the straight line path between at least one of the radiation sources 1506 and the radiation sensors 1502. FIG. 15 b additionally illustrates a section radiation blocking objects 1524 b that is also positioned to obstruct the straight line path between at least one of the radiation sources 1506 and each of the radiation sensor 1502.

The LCD display screen is mounted within frame 1508 and has a display surface 1528. The line of sight paths along which radiation from the radiation sources 1506 to the radiation sensors 1502 pass above the display surface, and are generally parallel to the display surface. Like LCD display screen of system 700 (FIG. 7), the LCD display screen of system 1500 has a resolution of X horizontal pixels by Y vertical pixels. Typically, frame 1508 will be mounted to the display screen, or will also form part of the housing of the display screen.

System 1500 may optionally include diffusers, such as the diffusers 530 and 630 illustrated in FIGS. 5 and 6.

System 1500 will typically include several input/output interfaces, similar to system 700 (FIG. 7).

As radiation blocking objects 1524 are moved about the surface 1528, the radiation blocking objects will block the path between one or more of the radiation sources 1506 and each of the radiation sensors 1502.

Referring also to FIGS. 17 a, 17 b and 17 c, radiation intensity signals 1522 a, 1522 b and 1522 c corresponding to each of the radiation sensors 1502 a, 1502 b and 1502 c respectively are illustrated when the radiation blocking objects 1524 a and 1524 b are in the positions illustrated in FIG. 15 b.

Radiation intensity signal 1522 a has two ranges of radiation sources with attenuated radiation intensity levels. Attenuated radiation sources 1506 j-1506 l correspond to radiation blocking object 1524 a. Attenuated radiation sources 1506 q-1506 s correspond to radiation blocking object 1524 b.

Radiation intensity signal 1522 b also has two ranges of radiation sources with attenuated radiation intensity levels. Attenuated radiation source 1506 a-1506 c correspond to radiation blocking object 1524 a. Attenuated radiation source 1506 h-1506 j correspond to radiation blocking object 1524 b.

Radiation intensity signal 1522 c also has two ranges of radiation sources with attenuated radiation intensity levels. Attenuated radiation source 1506 a-1506 c correspond to radiation blocking object 1524 a. Attenuated radiation source 1506 h-1506 j correspond to radiation blocking object 1524 b.

Controller 1504 is configured to analyze the radiation intensity signal for each radiation sensor to identify zero, one or more ranges of attenuated radiation sources as described above in relation to system 700 (FIGS. 7-14). Controller 1504 is also configured to calculate an angle corresponding to each range of attenuated radiation sources in radiation intensity signal 1522. In the example illustrated in FIG. 15 b, controller 1504 calculates angles θ_(a), θ_(b), φ_(a), φ_(b), α_(a) and α_(b) corresponding to the weighted average attenuation in the respective ranges in each of the radiation intensity signals 1522 a, 1522 b and 1522 c. The six calculated angles correspond to lines 1546 a, 1546 b, 1532 a, 1532 b, 1550 a and 1550 b.

Reference is next made to FIG. 18, which illustrates a method 1800 for estimating or identifying the positions of radiation blocking objects 1524 a and 1524 b. Method 1800 is performed under the control of controller 1504. Instructions for performing method 1800 are recorded in memory 1521. Processor 1520 accesses memory 1521 of obtain the stored instructions and executes the instructions to perform the method.

Method 1800 will be explained by way of example. Prior to the start of method 1800, no radiation blocking object is positioned on the display surface 1528.

Method 1800 begins in step 1802 in which a first radiation blocking object 1524 a is placed on the display surface 1528, as is illustrated in FIG. 15 a. FIGS. 16 a, 16 b and 16 c illustrates radiation intensity signals 1522 a, 1522 b and 1522 c corresponding to each of the radiation sensors 1502 a, 1502 b and 1502 c respectively when the radiation blocking object 1524 a is in the position illustrated in FIG. 15 a.

Processor 1504 calculates angles θ_(a), φ_(a) and α_(a) corresponding to the weighted average attenuation in the respective ranges in each of the radiation intensity signals 1522 a, 1522 b and 1522 c. The calculated angles correspond to lines 1546 a, 1532 a, 1532 b and 1550 a. Typically, lines 1546 a, 1532 a and 1550 a will not intersect. In the event that the three lines intersect, the point of intersection is calculated based on the positions of the sensors 1502 and the angles (θ_(a), φ_(a), α_(a)) and treated as the physical position P_(1524aa)(x_(aa), y_(aa)) of the radiation blocking object 1524 a.

Reference is made to FIG. 15 c, which illustrates lines 1546 a, 1532 a and 1550 a near radiation blocking object 1524 a in an expanded view. Typically, lines 1546 a, 1532 a and 1550 a will not intersect, as is illustrated. In the present embodiment, controller 1504 is configured to calculate a circle 1554 that is inscribed within the triangle 1552 formed by lines 1546 a, 1532 a and 1550 a. The center 1534 of this circle is calculated as the physical position P_(1524aa) of radiation blocking object 1524 a.

In various embodiments, the physical position P_(1524aa) of radiation blocking object 1524 a may be estimated in various manners. Reference is made to FIG. 15 d which illustrates an alternative method of estimating the physical position P_(1524aa) of radiation blocking object 1524 a. In this method, the point 1534 is calculated as the point at which the sum of the lengths of the lines 1554, 1556 and 1558, which extend respectively between the point and each of lines 1532 a, 1546 a and 1550 a is minimized. In other embodiments, the physical position P_(1524aa) may be calculated as the point at which the sum of the squares of the respective lengths of lines 1554, 1556 and 1558 is minimized. In other embodiments, the physical position P_(1524aa) may be calculated as the center of a circle that circumscribes triangle 1552. Various other geometric approaches may be used to determine the physical position P_(1524aa) of the radiation blocking object 1524.

To complete step 1802, controller 1504 records the physical position P_(1524aa) in a slot in a touch table recorded in memory 1521, converts the physical position to digital position P_(1524d) and provides the digital position at an interface 1548.

Method 1800 then proceeds to step 1804, which is similar in some regards to step 804 of method 800 (FIG. 8). In step 1804, controller 1504 operates system 1500 to sequentially obtain radiation intensity signals 1522 a, 1522 b and 1522 c from each of the sensor 1502 a, 1502 b and 1502 c. Controller 1504 analyzes each radiation intensity signal to determine the number of radiation blocking object represented in each radiation intensity signal 1522. As described above in relation to FIGS. 15 a and 16 a-16 c, when one radiation blocking object 1524 a is present on screen 1528 typically, each radiation intensity signal 1522 will have one range of attenuated radiation sources. FIGS. 15 b and 17 a-17 c, when two radiation blocking objects 1524 a, 1524 b are present on the screen 1528, each of the radiation intensity signals may have two ranges of attenuated radiation sources.

Reference is next made to FIGS. 19 and 20 a, 20 b and 20 c. FIG. 19 illustrates system 1500 in a condition where two radiation blocking objects 1524 a, 1524 b are collinear or almost collinear with radiation sensor 1502 b. FIGS. 20 a-20 c illustrates corresponding radiation intensity signals 1522 a-1522 c. Radiation intensity signal 1522 a and 1522 c each have two ranges of attenuated radiation intensity levels, similar FIGS. 17 a and 17 c. However, radiation intensity signal 1522 b has only one range of attenuated radiation levels corresponding to radiation sources 1506 a, 1506 b and 1506 c. Both radiation blocking objects 1524 a and 1524 b are blocking radiation emitted by these three radiation sources from reaching radiation sensor 1502 b.

Controller 1504 is configured to determine if each of the radiation intensity signals 1522 obtained in step 1804 appears to contain zero, one or two ranges of attenuated radiation intensity signals, as described in relation to step 804 of method 800 (FIG. 8).

In general, the number of radiation blocking objects will correspond the highest number of ranges of attenuated radiation sources identified in any one of radiation intensity signals 1522.

Method 1800 continues from step 1804 depending on the number of radiation blocking objects identified in the radiation intensity signals as follows:

Number of radiation Next blocking Condition step objects Each radiation intensity signal contains zero ranges of 1806 Zero attenuated radiation sources. Each radiation intensity signal contains one range of 1808 One attenuated radiation sources. Two radiation intensity signals contain one range of 1810 attenuated radiation sources and the other radiation intensity signal contains zero ranges of attenuated radiation sources. Each radiation intensity signal contains two ranges of 1814 Two attenuated radiation sources. Two radiation intensity signals contain two ranges of 1816 attenuated radiation sources and the other radiation intensity signal contains one range of attenuated radiation sources. Two radiation intensity signals contain two ranges of 1818 attenuated radiation sources and the other radiation intensity signal contains zero ranges of attenuated radiation sources. One radiation intensity signal contain two ranges of 1820 radiation sources and at least one of the other two radiation intensity signals contains one range of attenuated radiation sources. Otherwise. 1804

Method 1800 reaches step 1806 if no radiation blocking objects appear to be present on the screen 1528. Controller 1504 clears the touch table and method 1800 ends.

In step 1808, controller 1504 determines the physical position P1 a of a radiation blocking object 1524 in the manner described above in relation to step 1802.

Method 1800 then proceeds to step 1812, in which controller 1504 updates the touch table as described above in relation to step 806 of method 800 (FIG. 8). If only one physical position corresponding to one radiation blocking object is recorded in the touch table, the newly calculated physical position P1 a is recorded as the physical position of the radiation blocking object.

If two positions corresponding to two radiation blocking objects are recorded in the touch table, the controller determines which of the previously recorded positions is closest to the newly calculated physical position P1 a, which is then replaced with the newly calculated physical position. The other previously recorded position is deleted from the touch table.

Controller 1504 also converts the newly calculated physical position P1 a into a corresponding digital or pixel position P1 d, which is then provided at interface 1548.

Method 1800 then returns to step 1804.

In step 1810, only two of the three radiation sensors 1502 have radiation intensity signals 1522 that contain a range of attenuated radiation intensity levels. Controller 1504 estimates the physical position of a radiation blocking object in the manner described above in relation to step 806 of method 800 (FIG. 8). Controller 1504 calculates two angles (of the three angles θ_(a), φ_(a) and α_(a) illustrated in FIG. 15 a) corresponding to the two radiation intensity signals that have attenuated radiation sources. The controller then calculates the intersection point of the two lines (of the three lines 1546 a, 1532 a and 1550 a) corresponding to the two calculated angles. This intersection point is the physical position P1 a of the radiation blocking object.

Method 1800 then proceeds to step 1812.

Reference is made to FIGS. 15 b, 17 a-17 c and 18. In step 1814, each of the three radiation intensity signals 1522 a, 1522 b, 1522 c contains two ranges of attenuated radiation intensity levels. As described above, controller 1504 is configured to calculates angles θ_(a), θ_(b), φ_(a), φ_(b), α_(a) and α_(b) and corresponding lines 1546 a, 1546 b, 1532 a, 1532 b, 1550 a and 1550 b.

Controller 1504 determines the likely positions of two radiation blocking object using these six lines. By selecting one line corresponding to each radiation sensor 1502, the following triangles may be defined:

-   -   A: Lines 1546 a, 1532 a, 1550 a;     -   B: Lines 1546 a, 1532 a, 1550 b;     -   C: Lines 1546 a, 1532 b, 1550 a;     -   D: Lines 1546 a, 1532 b, 1550 b;     -   E: Lines 1546 b, 1532 a, 1550 a;     -   F: Lines 1546 b, 1532 a, 1550 b;     -   G: Lines 1546 b, 1532 b, 1550 a; and     -   H: Lines 1546 b, 1532 b, 1550 b.

Typically, each radiation blocking object will be positioned within one of these triangles. Controller 1504 analyzes the triangles to determine which triangles are most likely to contain the radiation blocking objects. Referring to FIGS. 15 e and 15 f, triangles A and E are illustrated, on different scales from one another. Triangle A is illustrated substantially expanded relative to FIG. 15 b.

In the present embodiment, controller 1504 is configured to determine the area of each triangle A-H. The triangles with the smallest area are deemed to be the triangles in which the radiation blocking objects are positioned. In this example, triangle A and triangle H have the smallest area. Controller 1504 is configured to identify a point within the triangles having the smallest area, which may be done in the manner described above in relation to step 1802. In FIG. 15 b, point 1534 is identified as the center of a circle inscribed in triangle A and point 1540 is identified as the center of a circle inscribed in triangle H (not shown in enlarged form). These points 1534 and 1540 are estimates of the physical locations P1 a and P2 a of the radiation blocking objects.

The triangles A-H may be compared in different manners to select triangles that are most likely to contain the physical locations of the radiation blocking objects. For example, in some embodiments, the triangles with the smallest perimeter may be selected. In other embodiments, other geometric techniques may be used to select triangles in which the radiation blocking objects are likely to be positioned. For example, in a situation where two triangles cannot be clearly distinguished as being smaller than the remaining triangles, some triangles may be selected based on their distance (or the distance of a selected point within the triangle) from currently recorded positions in the touch table.

In some embodiments, the size, perimeter or some other characteristic of each triangle may be combined with the position of the triangle from one (or more) currently recorded position in the touch table to select triangles. For example, in some embodiments, the perimeter of each triangle may be summed with the distance of the triangle (or a selected point within the triangle) from the closest currently recorded position in the touch table. The triangles with the lowest sum may be selected.

In other embodiments, the area of each triangle may be summed with the square of the distance between the triangle (or a selected point within the triangle) to the closest currently recorded position in the touch table. The triangles having the smallest sums may be selected.

In the event that two of the lines 1546 a, 1546 b, 1532 a, 1532 b, 1550 a and 1550 b are parallel, any combination of lines containing the parallel lines will not form a triangle and that combination is ignored.

When a pair of triangles have been selected, method 1800 proceeds to step 1822.

In step 1816, two of the radiation intensity signals 1522 have a pair of ranges of attenuated radiation intensity levels while the third has a single range of attenuated radiation intensity levels. Step 1816 is similar to step 1814, except that only combinations of lines that can be identified from the radiation intensity signals are used to identify triangles. For example, in FIG. 19, only line 1532 a may be identified based on radiation intensity signal 1522 b (FIG. 20 b). As a result, only triangles A, B, E and F described in step 1814 may be identified and analyzed.

The controller 1504 selects two triangles from the identifiable triangles and identifies physical positions P1 a and P2 a within those triangles.

Alternatively, the calculated angle and line for the radiation intensity signal having only one range of attenuated radiation levels (φ_(a) and 1532 a in FIG. 19) are duplicated (as φ_(b) and 1532 b in this example) and the triangles are identified and analyzed as in step 1814.

Method 1800 then proceeds to step 1822.

In step 1818, two of the radiation intensity signals 1522 have a pair of ranges of attenuated radiation intensity levels while the third does not have any range of attenuated radiation intensity levels. Controller 1504 ignores the radiation intensity signal without a range of attenuated radiation sources and identifies physical locations P1 a and P2 a of the radiation blocking objects in the manner described above in relation to step 808 of method 800 (FIG. 8).

Method 1800 then proceeds to step 1822.

In step 1820, one of the radiation intensity signals 1522 has a pair of ranges of attenuated radiation intensity levels and at least one of the other radiation intensity signals has a single range of attenuated radiation intensity levels.

If only of the other radiation intensity signals contains a range of attenuated radiation intensity levels, then the two radiation intensity signals have one and two ranges of attenuated radiation intensity levels are used to calculates positions P1 a and P2 a as described above in relation to step 810 of method 800 (FIG. 8).

If both of the other radiation intensity signals contains a range of attenuated radiation intensity levels, one of the radiation intensity signals is selected. In the present embodiment, the radiation intensity signal is selected based on a preference order of selecting the radiation intensity signal corresponding to radiation sensor 1502 a, 1502 b and then 1502 c. This order is used to ensure that, if possible, radiation intensity signals for radiation sensors 1502 a and 1502 b will be used, thereby providing a maximum separation between the vantage point of the sensor used to estimate the positions of the radiation blocking objects. The radiation intensity signal with two ranges of attenuated radiation levels and the selected radiation intensity signal are used to calculate physical positions P1 a and P2 a the manner described above in relation to step 810 of method 800 (FIG. 8).

In other embodiments, other techniques may be used to select between radiation intensity signals that include a single range of attenuated radiation intensity levels. For example, one of the radiation intensity signals may be chosen randomly or semi-randomly. One of the radiation intensity signals may be chosen if it was used in the previous or a recent calculation of positions P1 a or P2 a. In some embodiments, a radiation intensity signal may be selected based on a currently recorded position in one or two slots in the touch table. For example, if a currently recorded position is near the top edge 1510 and between radiation sensors 1502 b and 1502 c, then it may be preferable to estimate the position of an radiation blocking object using the radiation intensity signals for those sensors. In some embodiments, a different pair of radiation intensity signals may be used to calculate positions P1 a and P2 a.

Method 1800 then proceeds to step 1822.

In step 1822, method 1800 proceeds to step 1824 if two positions are currently recorded in the touch table, or to step 1826 if one position is recorded in the touch table.

In step 1824, controller 1504 updates the touch table, converts the physical positions into pixel positions P1 d and P2 d and reports the pixel positions at interface 1548, in the manner described above in relation to step 816 of method 800 (FIG. 8).

In step 1826, controller 1504 updates the touch table, converts the physical positions into pixel positions P1 d and P2 d and reports the pixel positions at interface 1548, in the manner described above in relation to step 814 of method 800 (FIG. 8).

Using method 1800, system 1500 is able to successively estimate the position of one or two radiation blocking objects on screen 1528.

Reference is next made to FIG. 21, which illustrates a system 2100 according to another embodiment of the invention. System 1500 is similar in construction to systems 100, 500, 700 and 1500 and corresponding components are identified by similar reference numerals. As with the systems described above, system 2100 may be used as an electronic whiteboard system or a touchscreen system.

In system 2100, four radiation sensors 2102 a, 2102 b, 2102 c and 2102 d are provided along the top edge 2110 of from 2108. Each radiation sensor is operated as described in relation to system 1500 to provide a radiation intensity signal.

System 2100 is used in a method analogous to method 1800 to estimate the positions of one or two radiation blocking objects on screen 2128.

The number of radiation blocking objects present on screen 2128 is assumed to be equal to the maximum number of ranges of attenuated radiation levels in any one of the radiation intensity signals.

If only one radiation blocking object is assumed to be present, then two or three radiation intensity signals that have one range of attenuated radiation intensity levels are selected. The radiation intensity signals may be selected based on a preferential order or using other techniques as described above in relation to step 1820 of method 1800 (FIG. 18). In this embodiment, a preferential order of radiation sensors in the order 2102 a, 2102 b, 2102 c and then 2102 d is used to select two three radiation intensity signals. If two signals are selected, then they are used to estimate the position of the radiation blocking object as described in step 1810 of method 1800. If three radiation intensity signals are selected, they are used to estimate the position of the radiation blocking object as described in step 1808 of method 1800.

If two radiation blocking objects are assumed to be present, then two or three of the radiation intensity signals are selected as described above. Radiation intensity signals having two ranges of attenuated radiation intensity levels are preferentially selected over radiation intensity signal having one or zero attenuated radiation intensity levels. Depending on the number of attenuated radiation intensity levels in the two or three radiation intensity signals, they selected radiation intensity signals are used as described above in steps 1814, 1816, 1818 or 1820 to estimate the positions of the radiation blocking objects.

The present invention has been described here by way of example only. Various modification and variations may be made to these exemplary embodiments without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention. 

1.-12. (canceled)
 13. A method of estimating the position of a radiation blocking object on a surface, the method comprising: providing at least three radiation sensors including a first radiation sensor, a second radiation sensor and a third radiation sensor; providing a plurality of radiation sources, wherein: radiation emitted by at least some of the radiation sources passes across the surface and is incident on the first sensor; radiation emitted by at least some of the radiation sources passes across the surface and is incident on the second sensor; and radiation emitted by at least some of the radiation sources passes across the surface and is incident on the third sensor; assembling a first radiation intensity signal corresponding to the first radiation sensor; assembling a second radiation intensity signal corresponding to the second radiation sensor; assembling a third radiation intensity signal corresponding to the third radiation sensor; and estimating the position of the radiation blocking object based on the first, second and third radiation intensity signals.
 14. The method of claim 13 further including adjusting at least one of the radiation intensity signals to account for ambient radiation.
 15. The method of claim 14 wherein adjusting a radiation intensity signal for ambient radiation includes obtaining an ambient radiation intensity level for the corresponding radiation sensor and adjusting the radiation intensity signal based on the ambient radiation intensity level.
 16. The method of claim 13 wherein each radiation intensity signal corresponding to a radiation sensor is assembled by sequentially sampling a radiation intensity level from the radiation sensor while at least some of the radiation sources are sequentially activated.
 17. The method of claim 13 wherein the radiation intensity signals are assembled contemporaneously.
 18. The method of claim 13 wherein at least one of the radiation sources is activated separately at different intensities to generate a radiation intensity signal corresponding to a first radiation sensor and a radiation intensity signal corresponding to the second radiation sensor.
 19. The method of claim 13 wherein the radiation intensity signals are assembled sequentially.
 20. The method of claim 19 wherein a first radiation intensity signal corresponding to the first radiation sensor is assembled and then a second radiation intensity signal corresponding to the second radiation sensor.
 21. The method of claim 13 wherein estimating the position of the radiation blocking object includes: identifying a first group of one or more attenuated radiation sources in the first radiation intensity signal; identifying a second group of one or more attenuated radiation sources in the second radiation intensity signal; identifying a third group of one or more attenuated radiation sources in the third radiation intensity signal; estimating the position of the radiation blocking object based on the position of the first group of attenuated radiation sources relative to first radiation sensor, the position of the second group of attenuated radiation sources relative to the second radiation sensor, and the position of the third group of attenuated radiation sources relative to the third radiation sensor.
 22. The method of claim 21 wherein estimating the position of the radiation blocking object includes: determining a polygon corresponding to the position of the first group of attenuated radiation sources relative to the first radiation sensor, the position of the second group of attenuated radiation sources relative to the second radiation sensor, and the position of the third group of attenuated radiation sources relative to the third radiation sensor; and estimating the position of the radiation blocking object based on the polygon.
 23. The method of claim 22 wherein estimating the position of the radiation blocking object based on the polygon includes identifying a point relative to the polygon.
 24. The method of claim 23 wherein the identified point selected from the group consisting of: a point at the center of a circle inscribed within the polygon; a point at the center of a circle that circumscribes the polygon; and a point at which the sum of the shortest distance from the point to the sides of the polygon is minimized. 25.-26. (canceled)
 27. The method of claim 21 wherein: identifying a first group of one or more attenuated radiation sources includes, for at least some of the radiation sources, comparing a radiation intensity level in the radiation intensity signal to a baseline level for the radiation source at the first radiation sensor; identifying a second group of one or more attenuated radiation sources includes, for at least some of the radiation sources, comparing a radiation intensity level in the radiation intensity signal to a baseline level for the radiation source at the second radiation sensor; and identifying a third group of one or more attenuated radiation sources includes, for at least some of the radiation sources, comparing a radiation intensity level in the radiation intensity signal to a baseline level for the radiation source at the third radiation sensor.
 28. The method of claim 21 wherein: a radiation source is only included in the first group if the radiation intensity level for the radiation source is below the baseline level for the radiation source at the first radiation sensor by a threshold; a radiation source is only included in the second group if the radiation intensity level for the radiation source is below the baseline level for the radiation source at the second radiation sensor by a threshold; and a radiation source is only included in the third group if the radiation intensity level for the radiation source is below the baseline level for the radiation source at the third radiation sensor by a threshold.
 29. The method of claim 21 wherein the estimating the position of the radiation blocking object includes: identifying a first center radiation source based on the first group; identifying a second center radiation source based on the second group; identifying a third center radiation source based on the third group; and estimating the position of the radiation blocking object based on the first center radiation source, the second center radiation source and the third center radiation source.
 30. The method of claim 13 wherein estimating the position of the radiation blocking object includes: identifying a first group of one or more attenuated radiation sources in the first radiation intensity signal; identifying a second group of one or more attenuated radiation sources in the second radiation intensity signal; identifying a second group of one or more attenuated radiation sources in the third radiation intensity signal; determining a first line based on the first group of attenuated radiation sources and the position of the first radiation sensor; determining a second line based on the second group of attenuated radiation sources and the position of the second radiation sensor; determining a third line based on the third group of attenuated radiation sources and the position of the third radiation sensor; and estimating the position of the position of the radiation blocking object based on the first, second and third lines.
 31. The method of claim 21 wherein estimating the position of the radiation blocking object includes: determining a polygon corresponding to first, second and third lines; and estimating the position of the radiation blocking object based on the polygon.
 32. The method of claim 22 wherein estimating the position of the radiation blocking object based on the polygon includes identifying a point relative to the polygon.
 33. The method of claim 32 wherein the identified point is selected from the group consisting of: a point at the center of a circle inscribed within the polygon; a point at the center of a circle that circumscribes the polygon; and a point at which the sum of the shortest distance from the point to the sides of the polygon is minimized. 34.-35. (canceled)
 36. The method of claim 30 wherein: identifying a first group of one or more attenuated radiation sources includes, for at least some of the radiation sources, comparing a radiation intensity level in the radiation intensity signal to a baseline level for the radiation source at the first radiation sensor; identifying a second group of one or more attenuated radiation sources includes, for at least some of the radiation sources, comparing a radiation intensity level in the radiation intensity signal to a baseline level for the radiation source at the second radiation sensor; and identifying a third group of one or more attenuated radiation sources includes, for at least some of the radiation sources, comparing a radiation intensity level in the radiation intensity signal to a baseline level for the radiation source at the third radiation sensor.
 37. The method of claim 36 wherein: a radiation source is only included in the first group if the radiation intensity level for the radiation source is below the baseline level for the radiation source at the first radiation sensor by a threshold; and a radiation source is only included in the second group if the radiation intensity level for the radiation source is below the baseline level for the radiation source at the second radiation sensor by a threshold; and a radiation source is only included in the third group if the radiation intensity level for the radiation source is below the baseline level for the radiation source at the third radiation sensor by a threshold.
 38. The method of claim 30 wherein determining the first line includes looking up a first angle in a lookup table, determining the second line includes looking up a second angle in a lookup table and determining the third line includes looking up a third angle in a lookup table.
 39. The method of claim 30 wherein determining the first line includes calculating a first angle, determining the second line includes calculating a second angle and determining the third line includes calculating a third angle.
 40. The method of claim 30 wherein: determining the first line includes calculating a weighted average based on the attenuation of radiation sources in the first group; determining the second line includes calculating a weighted average based on the attenuation of radiation sources in the second group; and determining the third line includes calculating a weighted average based on the attenuation of radiation sources in the third group. 41.-57. (canceled) 